Quotes—Page 4: More of What People are Saying

Here are a few more of our favorite things people have said about Speculative Grammarian over the years, collected wild on the internet, or domesticated in email.

Jump to page:  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23


Q988. Speculative Grammarian: satirical linguistics articles, including a “choose your career in linguistics” link that guides you to your future!

Northeastern University Linguistics


Q987. I have introduced my colleague to the SpecGram podcast, specifically Language Made Difficult. I apologise in advance!

—Jonathan Downie


Q986. So what wine does pair well with linguini?

—Mark Anderson


Q985. Scientists Discover New Case System. #brilliant

—Shlomo Argamon


Q984. The first question I ask a linguist is, “Are you cunning?”

—Ralph Hickok


Q983. Maybe you should call yourselves ‘languagists’ instead?

—Philip


Q982. This is an awesome take on a classic math joke: how do subfields of linguistics prove numbers to be prime?

—michiexile


Q981. I very nearly just took SpecGram seriously without realising it. Writing this essay will be the end of me...

—Dan Jordan


Q980. The greatest mistake across all disciplines is taking ourselves (and our positions) far too seriously. Enjoy! Disclaimer: I haven’t proofed the diagrams against the sources cited. Rely on them at your own risk. ;-)

Patrick Durusau


Q979. Wait wait wait... Let’s get to the real issue here. The author’s name is April May June and she is a Freshman in Elementary Education.

notadialect


Q978. “Hmm taalkundige, hoeveel talen spreek je dan?” #linguist #strikeback

—Sanne Berends


Q977. Brilliant#linguists strike back!

—Anson W. Mackay


Q976. For the non-linguists among us, speaking lots of languages is something awe-inspiring. And the fact is that lots of linguists are indeed polyglots. So while I like to think that I wouldn’t be crass enough to ask the question, I can understand the instinct, and I think it comes primarily from admiration and envy.

—Pflaumbaum


Q975. I doubt people really know what marine biologists, opthamalogists or anesthesiologist actually “do,” either.

—Jeff B.


Q974. We know that speaking lots of languages is a superpower we don’t have. We feel admiration or envy. On the other hand, we don’t know what linguists do. We suspect linguists may pretend to the scientific study of language without knowing languages. We find this possibility funny. We don’t realize that the study of language has nothing to do with actual languages.

—John Swindle


Q973. Interesting that no-one has raised the point that perhaps linguists really ought to be able to speak more than one language....

—Martin Ball


Q972. How do you know these many frameworks?

Matías Guzmán Naranjo


Q971. Yeah, Speculative Grammarian can be pretty funny, although I don’t know enough about linguistics and the academic culture thereof to get a lot of the jokes.

—Eschatokyrios


Q970. Aha, du är språkvetare. Hur många språk kan du?

—Charlotta af Hällstr


Q969. Within a week of SpecGram publishing [this], everyone is pondering Twitter’s potential downfall.

—Peter Bleackley


Q968. I still don’t get the NIVVT. :( Maybe I just don’t have the grasp of all those things well enough. Wait, is it a snoring sound?

—ZLVT


Q967. I like the Cartoon Theory of Linguistics about Morphological Typology. Ubykh as like twenty people-morphemes doing acrobatics off a cliff made me lol.

—Eschatokyrios


Q966. One for the linguists :-)

—Rachel Cotterill


Q965. I found this great satire of conlangs and thought other people ... would enjoy it, too. The article is called “Doing Fieldwork on Constructed Languages”.

—jute


Q964. I think this might be me, except in Everett, Washington.

—Brooke Larson


Q963. Do some of those words perhaps have something to do with Amharic being a Semitic language, and Turkish having loanwords from Arabic, which is also a Semitic language?

Terpomo11


Q962. The linguist strikes back!

—Language Writer


Q961. This is 35 years old & still awesome.

—Darin Flynn


Q960. なんだこれはwwwwww

—SYNTAX FAIRY


Q959. The big paperback is a huge value.

—J Paul S


Q958. SpecGram is the best thing to happen to satirical linguistics since Chomsky convinced everyone he was being serious in 1957.

A Punning Linguist


Q957. Speculative Grammarian, as well as monthly satirical articles, has a range of books, including a Primer in SF Xenolinguistics.

Sean Roberts


Q956. Oh, Speculative Grammarian... what would we do without you...

—Andrew Hardie


Q955. The linguists strike back. ... Beaming with pride as I see this. :)

—Vandana Bajaj


Q954. I’m a lawyer. Given how many people, on meeting me, think it’s amusing to insult me to my face, I’d love to be asked how many languages I speak.

—Rube


Q953. So is the joke that linguists always get asked how many languages they know?

—GH


Q952. Thirteen really untranslatable words.

Talk the Talk


Q951. Oh my goodness I have got to start applying their success criteria to my projects.

—David Smith


Q950. I lolled at the note about the nasal ingressive voiceless velar trill when I came upon it. But I guess you need to know phonetics quite well to get it.

—Dingbats


Q949. Ahahahaha

—Asymptotic Binary


Q948. I kill Chomsky and take his place as grand high linguistic poobah.

—ZLVT


Q947. I kinda liked the “choose your own career in linguistics” module.

—Clerria


Q946. I browsed through some of [SpecGram’s] material ... and found it rather amusing.

—xyzzy


Q945. To those of you still fretting over the Oxford Comma dilemma, the “august journal” Speculative Grammarian offers [a] solution.

Marian Dougan


More ...


Last updated Jan. 22, 2025.