SpecGram >> Vol CXC, No 4 >> Here We Go Again —or, This Too Shall Pass—A Letter from the Editor-in-Chief
Here We Go
Again 
or, This Too
Shall Pass
A Letter from the
Editor-in-Chief
Longtime1 readers of SpecGram will recall this journal’s most recent phœnexian rebirth in 2004, which was followed a few months and two issues later by the Brood X Magicicada Super Issue, a “celebratory” observance of the invasion of our D.C. offices by uncontrolled throngs of Brood X Magicicada septendecim. As any competent entomologist (and, really, any half-competent etymologist) could tell you, the offspring of that summer’s nominal locusts are to be expected to come calling seventeen years later.2
And thus—a generation later, in the year 2021—I close my eyes, take a deep breath, and can’t help but think, “Here we go again...”
They fill the air with their ceaseless, pointless droning, flitting and fluttering gracelessly and without apparent purpose from place to place, brainlessly bumping into and bouncing off of their biological betters, collectively barely sensate enough to seek some semblance of orgiastic oblivion before their inevitable demise. I’m speaking, of course, of the current crop of midsummer interns... though looking back at my words I see that an uncareful reader3 might mistake my musings for Magicicada maligning—something I am in fact more than happy to engage in, just not at this particular moment.
I don’t want to devolve into yelling at the interns for being on my lawn,4 but kids these days... what can I say? They barely know what a book is. They couldn’t make a philological argument to save their own lives.5 They can’t differentiate semantics and pragmatics, nor semiotics and semiology, nor Prof. Noarn Chornsky and Prof. Noam Chomsky. Even spoon-feeding them Phlogiston’s Cartoon Theories of Linguistics leaves them no less dim than before. They prattle on about computational “linguistics”, computer “science”, statistical “models”, artificial “intelligence”, machine “learning”, and “neural” networks—with nary a clue what most of those words even mean, much less how they (fail to) apply to real linguistics.8 Not a one of them could pass a basic, proper phonology test without a computational crutch.9
Despite a lack of any evidence of any actual humanity among them, I have tried to connect to them on a human level. But, yet again, they let me down. Nary a one of them has seen Vowel Space, The Trill Hunter, Conan the Librarian, Green Linguarian,10 John Stuart Mill and the Temple of Doom, The Uvular Suspects, E.T. the Extrametrical, or any other of the classiest of the classics.
Nonetheless, as every summer must eventually come to an end, I remind myself, “This too shall pass.” Eventually, nothing will be left but the hollowed out husks and other detritus of their revolting molting, the echos of their shrill mating calls having faded to a peevish quietude. I’m speaking, of course, of the current crop of perennial old fogeys emeritus,11 who waste so much time and energy yelling ineffectually at the current crop of midsummer interns... though looking back at my words I see that an uncareful reader12 might mistake my musings for Magicicada maligning—something I am in fact more than happy to engage in, just not at this particular moment.
Perhaps I have been too harsh on both the new interns and the old fogeys.13 We have all been feeling broodier since the last Brood X issue; maybe it’s time to lighten up a bit and enjoy the season.
O aestās !
PS: Those pesky tribes of vermin are now gone from my presence, each for their respective season,14 though not before delaying this issue so much that we had to recast it as the Mid-July issue to save face. It’s all been too much, and we’re15 taking a European-style16 August Vacation. Speculative Grammarian will return in September.
1 Relatively speaking, of course. By the helter-skelter, willy-nilly, pell-mell, and otherwise generally reduplicative measure of Internet Time™ in the Internet Age™, 17 years is forever. For true devotees of SpecGram, it is, at most “a spell”.
SpecGram has an internal system of ranks for the longevity of subscriptions, with those of the greatest antiquity having been bequeathed down through the generations. The barest outline of the system of ranks and sub-ranks, based on subscription length in years, is presented below:
< 10 Nihilum
10 Parchment
11 Palimpsest
13 Papyrus
15 Bookfell
17 Vellum
19 Sheepskin
20 Paper
21 Towel
22 Tiger
23 Clip
24 Trail
25 Mâché
26 Origami
27 Proofread
28 Submitted
29 Accepted
30 Tenuretrackium
40 Leather
41 Lederhosen
43 Recliner
45 Glove
47 Jacket
49 Pants
50 Iron
53 Deficiency
56 Curtain
59 Mask
62 Fist
65 Lung
68 Maiden
71 Butterfly
74 Y
75 Copper
83 Wire
92 Pipe
100 Bronze
106 Statue
112 Star
118 Age
125 Lace
131 Doily
137 Garter
143 Négligée
150 Silver
154 Lining
158 Tongue
162 Bullet
165 Stevienicksium
175 Gold
176 Digger
178 Standard
179 Dust
180 Leaf
182 Star
183 Rush
184 Fever
185 Golden
186 Calf
188 Shower
189 Horde
190 Handcuffs
191 Ratio
193 Goose
194 Fleece
196 Parachute
197 Rule
199 Retriever
200 Diamond
204 in the Rough
208 Cut
212 Color
216 Clarity
220 Carat
225 Saw
229 Ring
233 Back
237 Bracket
241 Square Algorithm
245 Water Paradox
250 Moonstone
300 Sunstone
350 Antimatter
400 Historicitite
416 Red Mercury
433 Phlogiston
450 Orichalcum
466 Hihi’irokane
483 Depleted Uranium
500 Cinematicine
509 Upsidaisium
518 Latinum
527 Dilithium
536 Trilithium
545 Naquahdah
554 Tylium
563 Carbonite
572 Beskar
581 Quantium-40
590 Turbinium
600 Comiconium
614 Kryptonite
628 Uru
643 Vibranium
657 Amazonium
671 Nth Metal
686 Adamantium
700 Literatite
709 Thiotimoline
718 Vril
727 Octiron
736 Stygium
745 Cavorite
754 Arenak
763 Dimeritium
772 Scrith
781 Mithril
790 Galvorn
800 Computronium
820 Turing Complete
840 P ≠ NP
860 P = NP
880 Hedonium
900 Unobtanium
916 Bolognium
933 Handwavium
950 Raritanium
966 Impossibrium
983 Eludium
1000 Tenurite
1125 Full
1250 Distinguished
1375 Emeritus
1500 Alchēmium
1550 Γῆ
1600 Ὕδωρ
1650 Ἀήρ
1700 Πῦρ
1750 Αἰθήρ
1800 Alkahest
1850 Quintessence
1900 Māteria Prīma
1950 Lapis Philosophōrum
2000 [REDACTED]
2 Cicadas returning every seventeen years makes their visits a smidge more than three times as frequent as those of the Grammar Entelechy. By coincidence, cicadas are also slightly more than three times as attractive as the representatives of the Grammar Entelechy, and easily three times as welcome to visit.
Less coincidentally, our editorial strategy for dealing with the Grammar Entelechy is similar to the cicada’s reproductive strategy for dealing with their antagonists: predator satiation. Cicadas inundate their attackers with more prey than they can eat; SpecGram overwhelms the Grammar Entelechy with more interns than it can rip souls from.
3 Worried you might be an uncareful reader? You probably are, but if you checked the footnotes there’s at least some hope for you.
4 That, of course, is a lie. I would love to do that, especially while turning on the sprinklers and releasing the hounds.
5 This is arguably not even hyperbole. Though they scatter like vermin6 when I come into their holding pen each morning, I can always corner a few of them. I ask them to make a simple philological argument, and those that fail to do so—which is all of them, by the way—are ejected from the building.7 Since a SpecGram internship is clearly more valuable than their worthless lives, Q.E.D.
6 As vermin will.
7 The engineering interns have suggested using a trebuchet for literal ejection, but the legal interns have made a convincing argument that doing so is unlawful. The philosophy interns suggested that it was also immoral, at which point the legal interns implied that using the trebuchet on philosophy interns might be a legal grey area.
8 i.e., philology, as previously discussed.
9 The worst use actual electronic computers to do their work, but even those who require less powerful computational aids—such as pencil and paper—are still an embarrassment.
10 Admittedly Green Linguarian is not the greatest cinematolingual achievement of a generation or anything. I even gave it a fairly poor review—1.5 out of 5 Stones—almost ten years ago. But these whippersnappers haven’t even heard of it. Its awfulness has aged like a fine whine, and these pipsqueaks cannot appreciate it.
11 That is, the ones whose keys to the executive washroom we are unable to reclaim, whether for contractual or pure practical reasons—old fogey strength is real!
12 See footnote 3, if you haven’t already.
13 Actually, probably not—they are all a bunch of pains in my derrière. But the psychology interns claim that it may be better for my own mental health to cut them some slack. I remain unconvinced.
14 Seventeen years underground for the cicadas, the rest of the summer in the work pits for the interns, the rest of the afternoon in the Napatorium Emeritus for the old fogeys.
15 The Editorial We, of course. I’ll be lounging along the placid shores of the [REDACTED] Riviera with a favored subset of the Editorial Board, while the Lesser Editors and interns work double shifts. C’est la vie.
16 The EU legal interns inform me that, due to the failure of the Speculeave Grammaretreat initiative (a.k.a. SpexitGramexit), I have to inform you that it is only a “European August Vacation” if you are primarily employed in one of the August-Vacationing Regions of Europe. Otherwise, it is just a sparkling month-long vacation.
|