Dear Boys and Girls,
Two months ago you returned my latest submission. To the sentence that read, “And so it is clear that Chomskyans, failed clowns, and undiagnosed schizophrenics [your emphasis] must be registered by the Department of Health and Human Services to prevent further misappropriations of these funding programs under the Vocational Rehabilitation Act of 1973,” you made a note to the emphasized part reading, “Please avoid redundancy in the future.” Please note that in your October 2016 issue, Associate Editor Mikael Thompson wrote, “their language did not resemble Ancient Greek, proto-
Sincerely,
Skiffy Bafflegab
Dear Sniffly,
Very clever, that. Addressing us as “boys and girls”, you know. Sort of missed the point, didn’t you?
Do some more reading and try again. Better yet, do some thinking.
—Eds.
Speculative Grammarian accepts well-
Dear Eds,
I was just wondering, does anybody actually use “buffalo” as a verb in any context other than “Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo”?
William Cody
Dear B’Bill,
We could answer but we would be bison our response on our own experience and we wouldn’t want you to be cowed by that. It behoofs you to duodenum-
—Eds.
Dear Ma’ams/
In your latest editorial, your gloriously butch bastard wrote, “Our brains want the world to be digital, despite its deeply enduring analog nature. So that’s that sorted.” How very digital of him!
Sincerely,
Hannah Logue
RGVhc iBIYW 5uYWg sDQoN ClRoY XTigJ lzIGN lcnRh aW5se SBhIH ZhbGl kIHBv aW50L iBBbm Qgbm9 0IGp1 c3Qgd GhlIG 9uZSB vbiB0 aGUgd G9wIG 9mIHl vdXIg aGVhZ C4NCg 0KRGl naXRh bGx5I HlvdX JzLA0 K4oCU RWRz