Cartoon Theories of Linguistics
Part E—Phonetics vs. Phonology
Hilário Parenchyma, C.Phil.
Unintentional University of Lghtnbrgstn
We will skip the introduction, as we have been there, done that. Once more into the breach! For this installment in our series on Cartoon Theories of Linguistics, we will turn our attention to Phonetics and Phonology and the difference between the two:
Phonetics:
Phonology:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e9895/e9895b1e64f67a6df96500f2defb11bb95c0a9f9" alt=""
Thanks to Professor Phlogiston, of the Unintentional University of Lghtnbrgstn, for the opportunity of a lifetime, as a student, to, on this occasion, share with so many of my fellow linguisticians my views, as illustrated above, concerning matters, which are of such immeasurable import to me, in this forum!—H.P.
Forthcoming: Physics vs. Physics Envy.
References
- Bloomfield, L. (1914). An introduction to the study of language.
- Clements, G. N. (1985). “The geometry of phonological features.” Phonology Yearbook, 2, 225-252.
- de Saussure, F. (1916). Cours de linguistique générale. Payot.
- Goldsmith, J. A. (1989). Autosegmental and metrical phonology: A new synthesis. Basil Blackwell.
- Halle, M. (1954). “The strategy of phonemics.” Word, 10, 197-209.
- Headland, T. N., K. L. Pike, and M. Harris. (1990). Emics and Etics: The Insider/Outsider Debate. Sage Publications.
- Hockett, C. F. (1955). A manual of phonology. Waverley Press.
- Jakobson, R. (1949). “On the identification of phonemic entities.” Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Copenhague, 5, 205-213.
- Ladefoged, P. (1982). A course in phonetics. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
- Pike, K. (1947). Phonemics: A technique for reducing languages to writing. University of Michigan Press.
- Pike, K. L. (1943). Phonetics: A critical analysis of phonetic theory and a technic for the practical description of sounds. University of Michigan Press.
- Sapir, E. (1925). “Sound patterns in language.” Language, 1, 37-51.
- Swadesh, M. (1934). “The phonemic principle.” Language, 10, 117-129.