If you don’t know who or what Doge is,1 you are in good company
|
For another thing, Doʊɡ cares about linguistics19 and language much more than Doge does.20 Animacy, meter, tone, Esperanto,22 syntax, generativity, acronyms, and /bɾoːɡ/s—Doʊɡ does it all.23
For a third thing, Doʊɡ counts “one”, “two”, “many”
1 And if your answer has anything to do with Italian city states during the medieval and renaissance periods, then you don’t know.
2 For example, Rasmus Rask and Holger Pedersen almost certainly don’t know who Doge is. And the Stats Interns put the likelihood that Chomsky knows at 0.030424%.3
4 That’s the 38% confidence interval.5
6 The Stats Interns said it was good. They wouldn’t lie, would they?7
7 Awww, man! There’s gonna be some serious floggin’ when I get my hands on those good for nothing sons of —8
8 [The rest of this footnote is protected by attorney-
9 No one is literally10 too cool for school. Stay in school, kids.13
10 And while we appreciate the kind of semantic change that shifts an iron-
11 We really understand. We “very understand.”12
12 That comment was Doʊɡ approved!
13 That’s secondary school and undergrad. Graduate school is a crapshoot nowadays.14
14 Or, for you linguistic degenerates out there, anymore.15
15 Not that I’m a prescriptivist, but, really? Positive anymore? Who does that?
16 Though much less-
17 And yours, if you know what’s good for you.
18 Though Doʊɡ does appreciate practical orthographic conventions.
19 Chomsky may not know who Doʊɡ is,2 but Doʊɡ knows who Chomsky is!
21 Possibly leading to a state of very ass, so u, many me
22 Bilingually, no less. Just you wait and see!
23 And with style.