This issue of Speculative Grammarian is unlike any that has every come before and
This is a tad ironic, one might suppose, as the grammarian philosophy of the Modistae (i.e., the so-called speculative grammarians of the 13th and 14th centuries) is in direct opposition to the nominalism of William of Ockham. However:
First,it’s the 21st century— we should let bygones be bygones. (ii)While the philosophical Modistae obviously took the name “speculative grammarians” as an homage to this publication, we are not them and they are not us.三.It’s not like anyone can take Billy-Boy seriously when he can’t decide how to spell Oc{c,kh}am. Δ)We’re going to stick it to them-there Occams by multiplying entities like nobody’s business. Are they unnecessary? Nay — they are wholly necessary!!
To that end we have not one, not two, but three Occam-
So