1st act, 1st scene
Antigone: Ismene, my sister, my dearest, our brother is dead and unburied shall he lie, for Kreon hath set forth and ranked highest this constraint which declares *burial.5 But, nay, I cannot comply with that hierarchy.
Ismene: My dear, my beloved sister! Thou wouldst bury him and violate that highest-
Kreon: Thus is the spirit of my theorising: [πατριώτης] shall be the feature which shall prevail in our city of Thebes. And it shall be proclaimed to all dwellers within the walls of noble Thebes
Messenger: My liege! Despite all rankings, all hierarchies, there hath been violation of thy royal constraint.
Kreon: What sayest thou? Alas! I fear that I might lose my hitherto strict and unquestioned domination over all possible candidates that could have done the deed.
2nd act, 1st scene
Kreon: Thou hast been seen violating my royal constraint,6 however opaque was the night. Tell me thou! Knewest thou that *burial is ranking highest?
Antigone: I knew it, how could I help it? It was transparent.
Kreon: Still thou wast not Faithful to the constraint. Why couldst thou not align with other Thebans?
Antigone: Thou rankedst thy constraint locally, in this town, only. But in UG7,8 ’tis different, and faithfulness to kinsfolk is required.
Kreon: ’Tis determined, then, that she shall pass to the world of the dead.
Ismene: If thou art broyges with her, then I shall share her sort, for we are of the same ancestor node!9
Antigone: Nay, my sister, I will not suffer thee to do that.
3rd act, 1st scene
Kreon: Lo, Haimon, my son! Thou canst not possibly be sympathetic with the maid,10 for thee knowest that if there was licensing of her misdeed, then I could not govern here,11 and therefore12 nor couldst thou, some day in the future of Derivational History. Nay, do not thou think too much of her, since she was no optimal candidate for thou, and no less shouldst thou require of thy future spouse. Antigone shall perish, be counterfed to death.
2nd & 3rd scene
Antigone: (wandering among syntactic trees13) [ɑ:::x]! Here I am, proceeding toward the realm of silence. My fate hath doomed me. The world of empty elements is calling me... welcoming a new null-
4th act, 1st scene
(In which a group of old men communicate with tAntigone, but they use telepathy,14,15 so if you don’t already know what they’re saying, you’ll never know.)
The first coming of the prophet Tiresias.16
Teirésias (the great old master of zeromancy,17,18 who had the annoying habit of expressing himself in French19 to make himself sound more mysterious, pronounces the following words, famously not fully understood by Kreon, whose French was rather rudimentary): Ô Kréôn, fils de Ménoikeus, songe à ceci: Un mort peut en cacher un autre!
Chorus: Thou heardest the dread prophecy! Grant the maiden the delayed release! Bury Polyneikes!
- - - ΣΥΝΕΧΙΖΕΤΑΙ - - -
Next time: Kreon buries Polyneikes, but Antigone and Haimon kill themselves20 in a dramatic scene.21 Eurydiki, Haimon’s mother, is told what happens, but leaves without saying a word22 and later kills herself, too.
• Adams, D., 1982, Life, the Universe and Everything. Pan Books.
• Attardo, S., 1994, Linguistic Theories of Humour. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
• Bendann, E., 2003, Death Customs: An Analytic Study of Burial Rites. Near Glacier National Park : Kessinger Publishing.
• Brassard, G., A. Broadbent and A. Tapp, 2005, “Quantum Pseudo-
• Bullard, J.E., 1997, “A note on the use of the ‘Fryberger Method’ for evaluating potential sand transport by wind”. Journal of Sedimentary Research 67; 499-501.
• Carr, C., 1995, “Mortuary practices: Their social, philosophical-
• Dasos, K., Z. Elia and M. Itia, 1989, “Early Post-
• Dasos, K. and A. Elatou, 1991, “Post-
• Dasos, K., E. Pefkou and S. Kyparissiou, 1996, “Early Post-
• Dresher, E., 1996, “The Rise of Optimality Theory in First Century Palestine”. GLOT International 2:1/2.
• Edwards, M., 1997, “Deaf and dumb in Ancient Greece”. L. J. Davis (ed), The Disability Studies Reader. New York, London: Routledge; 29-51.
• Evens, S.T., 1998, “ ‘xcuse me. Is that a zero in your function?” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 95:21; 12465-12467.
• Garcia, Æ. λ., 1990, “Divine Unification Grammar”. Journal of the Linguistic Society of South-
• Greeley, R., Blumberg, D., Williams, S.H., 1996, “Field measurements of the flux and speed of wind-
• Gruner, C.R., 1997, The Game of Humor: A Comprehensive Theory of Why We Laugh. Piscataway: Transaction Books.
• Hale, M. and C. Reiss, 1995, “On the Initial Ranking of OT Faithfulness Constraints in Universal Grammar”. Poster presented at the 27th Stanford Child Language Research Forum 1995.
• Idsardi, W.J., 1997, “Sympathy creates Chaos”. Ms., UDelaware.
• Kafebathartukodut, A. and G. Gureherriapolitada, 2004. “Syntactic Nodes. Cut ‘em or leave ‘em. With a special emphasis on Basque auxiliaries”. Studies in Basque Linguistics 23: 4; 45-75.
• Kidd, W., 2000, “Frenchness: constructed and reconstructed”. W. Kidd and S. Reynolds (eds), Contemporary French Cultural Studies. London: Arnold.
• Le Hir, M.P., 1997, Imagining the Discipline: Beyond Frenchness and Francophilia. Contemporary French Civilization.
• Lowe, John, 1986, “Theories of Ethnic Humor: How To Enter, Laughing”. American Quarterly 38:3; 439-460.
• Lumley, H., 1979, “L’Homme de Tautavel, il y a 450 000 ans”. Dossiers d’Archéologie.
• Mentis, M., Briggs-Whittaker, J., Gramigna, G.D., 1995, “Discourse Topic Management in Senile Dementia of the Alzheimer’s Type”. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 38; 1054-1066.
• Meerloo, A.M., 1949, “Telepathy as a form of archaic communication”. Psychiatric Quarterly 23:4; 691-704.
• Pefkou, E. and K. Dasos, 1996, “Passive voice post-
• Plakas, A., Asteiopoulos, G. and Xatzixamogelaki, F., 2005, “Academic Humour”. Sovaros, T. (ed), Recent Advances in Advanced Studies of Gelotophobia. Psammeticus Press.
• Portokali, Z. (forthcoming at some still undetermined point in the space-
• Prince, A. and P. Smolensky, 1993, Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar. Rutgers University Cognitive Science Center (ROA-537).
• Racz, P., 2008, “An Introduction to Classical Generative Psychology”. Speculative Grammarian CLIII:4.
• Raskin, V., 1985, Semantic Mechanisms of Humour. Heidelberg: Springer Verlag.
• Rimmer, W., 2006, “Measuring grammatical complexity: the Gordian knot”. Language Testing 23:4; 497-519.
• Ruch, W. (ed), 2007, The Sense of Humour: Explorations of a Personality Characteristic. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
• Smith, W., 2008, “Moving across libraries. Bibliothetical migration patterns in academics.” Miller, F. (ed), Behaviour in Academia: Slightly Weird and Somehow Strange. Psammeticus Press.
• Sûr, G. and Certain, J., 2007, Le fragment de ΣΑΙΞΠΗΡ sur papyrus. Publications de l’Ecole Française d’Archéologie d’Athènes.
• Utrolig, Ø., Frokost, I., Jordbaersyltetøy, J. and Lillehaugen, M., 2004, “They didn’t like it!” Journal of Unexpected Findings 28:4; 34-78.
• Vennenmin, Å., 2004, “Yes, they did! A reply to Utrolig et al.” Journal of Unexpected Findings 28:4; 212-234.
• Warcollier, R., J. Gridley, 2006, Experiments in Telepathy. Near Glacier National Park: Kessinger Publishing.
• Yokoyama, Y. and H.V. Nguyen, 1981, “Datation directe de l’Homme de Tautavel par la spectrométrie gamma, non destructive, du crâne humain”. Comptes rendus des séances de l’Académie des Sciences de Paris.
• Yokoyama, Y., J.P. Quaegebeur, R. Bibron, C. Léger et al., 1982, “Datation du site de l’Homme de Tautavel par la résonance du spin électronique (ESR)”. Comptes rendus de l’Académie des Sciences de Paris.
|A Poetic Meditation on English Spelling Rules and Reform For Two Contrasting Voices—Eysp L. Kore-Eckly|
|Grammars in Contrast Series Series—Series of Series Announcement from Psammeticus Press|
|SpecGram Vol CLV, No 3 Contents|