Decoupling the Linguolabial Trill From Its Ideobatian Association—Eunice Emigre SpecGram Vol CLXXXVI, No 2 Contents Good Enough for Folk Etymology—Part VIII—A. Pocryphal & Verity du Bius

Notes on Arunta Morphology

Orville Man-Quinnan Ward
Winter Academy of Language

Arunta noun roots are generally short, often simple open monosyllables, e.g.

ga
“rabbit”
va
“part”

Compounding is head final, hence

gava
ga-va
rabbit-part
“part of a rabbit”

Plurals are formed by reduplication, e.g.

gaga
ga~ga
rabbit~PL
“rabbits”
vava
va~va
part~PL
“parts”
gavagava
ga-va~gava
rabbit-part~PL
“rabbit parts”

However, if reduplication results in words of more than three syllables, the last is often elided, hence

gavaga
ga-va~ga
rabbit-part~PL
“rabbit parts”

Collective nouns are formed with the suffix -i, which phonologically forms a diphthong when following a vowel

gai
ga-i
rabbit-COLL
“colony of rabbits”
vai
va-i
part-COLL
“group of parts”
gavai
ga-va-i
rabbit-part-COLL
“collection of rabbit parts”

These pluralise in the usual way

gaigai
ga-i~gai
rabbit-COLL~PL
“rabbit colonies”
vaivai
va-i~vai
part-COLL~PL
“groups of parts”
gavaiga
ga-va-i~ga
rabbit-part-COLL~PL
“collections of rabbit parts”

However, when the collective suffix is applied to a word that is already plural, this indicates that the members of the group are considered to form a unified whole, as in

gavagai
ga-va~ga-i
rabbit-part~PL-COLL
“collection of undetached rabbit parts”

Because of the preponderance of monosyllabic roots in Arunta, the idea of “the parts of a thing considered as a whole” is often used suppletively to refer to the thing itself, hence

gavagai
“rabbit”

Decoupling the Linguolabial Trill From Its Ideobatian AssociationEunice Emigre
Good Enough for Folk EtymologyPart VIIIA. Pocryphal & Verity du Bius
SpecGram Vol CLXXXVI, No 2 Contents